This study examines the differences in quality of life between the Smart City of Faridabad and the Non-Smart City of Rohtak in Haryana, focusing on socio-economic, environmental, and infrastructural aspects. Using selected indicators such as education, income, housing, sanitation, air quality, and health, the research assesses how urban governance models influence living standards. Faridabad, as part of the Smart Cities Mission, exhibits improved income levels and enhanced access to sanitation and housing facilities, reflecting the benefits of planned urban development. However, it also faces challenges such as rising pollution and urban congestion, with its air quality often falling into the “poor” category, affecting public health and livability. Rohtak, although not a smart city, offers a more community-focused lifestyle with moderate income levels, stronger social cohesion, and a relatively healthier environment in certain aspects. Yet, limitations in healthcare infrastructure and employment opportunities remain. The comparison reveals that smart city initiatives improve infrastructure and economic growth but do not automatically guarantee social and environmental well-being. The study concludes that quality of life depends not only on technological or infrastructural progress but also on social inclusivity, environmental sustainability, and equitable access to basic amenities, highlighting the need for a more human-centred approach to urban development.
WhatsApp | Impact Factor: 6.21