General Responsibility of Editor
- The Editor is authorised for the selection and publication of the Article in the journal.
- They endeavour to meet the needs of authors and improve their journal frequently.
- They should always be ready to rectify the corrections or mistakes, and if needed, comments should be given to the author for further improvement.
- Their evaluation will never be based on the author’s name, philosophy, gender, etc.
- Editor-in-Chief is the person who selects reviewers for reviewing the paper. And he will guide the reviewers to know the points that need to be followed at the time of submission.
- If required, the editor can seek help and confer with other editors or reviewers.
- If any plagiarism is found in your research paper, it will be rejected, and to ensure acceptance of the paper, make sure your paper follows the principles of originality and clarity. The right to publish or reject is reserved for the editor.
- The editor can only share the details of the manuscript with authorised reviewers, the publisher or the author. And your submitted paper is under concealment.
- Without any signed agreement from the author, the editor is not able to use the unpublished information of their own research work.
- It is necessary to agree on all standards that are expected of the legal behaviour for all.
General Responsibility of Reviewer
- Reviewer is responsible for reviewing the paper and if they found everything according to journal format. The paper is allowed to publish.
- They ensure that non-peer-reviewed sections of the journal are clearly reread.
- Reviewers are selected by the Editor, and they have no right to know the name of the publisher or the author.
- If they found themselves unqualified for reviewing the paper, they can inform the editor promptly.
- Confidentiality is ensured during the review session; reviewers cannot disclose the information to any person.
- Reviews should be defined objectively. No personal criticism is allowed. Comments to the author should be clearly defined so they can modify their paper accordingly.
- If the manuscript is found to be copied, reviewers need to inform the editor.
- Information that is unpublished in the author’s manuscript cannot be used by reviewers or editors for their personal research.
- Ensure that data collected through peer review is preserved and not used for individual benefits.
- Reviewers who have a conflict of interest are required to disclose the information to other publishing supervisors or reviewers.
General Responsibility of the Author
- Statistics of quantitative statements should be characterised exactly in the paper.
- Accurate detail, objective, significance, conclusion, or reference is required in the final research paper.
- The author should permit others to check the related information, and if they find any fraudulent or incongruous standards, it will not be accepted.
- Make sure you have raw data and reference data of related research work with you, as sometimes journal reviewers may ask for this.
- After publication, authors should make sure the accessibility of the paper for other professionals is maintained for at least ten years.
- Ensure that their submitted work follows the principles of originality and clarity and that no plagiarism is present. If the review panel finds a copy case, they can reject the paper.
- Unethical behaviour is when you submit the same paper to more than one journal.
- The corresponding authors should ensure that the final research paper is also approved by their co-authors.
- If any error or modification is needed and commented by the publisher, the author's responsibility is to improve it and again send it for publication.
- For the project, the financial support sources must be disclosed. At the outset, they can disclose conflicts of interest that may affect their results.