The International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED) follows a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic integrity of all published manuscripts. Peer review serves as a critical quality-control mechanism through which subject experts evaluate submitted research for its relevance, methodology, contribution, and scholarly merit.
Peer reviewers provide independent and objective recommendations; however, the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of a manuscript rests solely with the Editorial Board of IJHED.
Types of Peer Review
Academic journals generally follow one of the following peer-review models:
-
Single-Blind Review: Reviewer identities are concealed from authors.
-
Double-Blind Review: Both author and reviewer identities are concealed from each other.
-
Open Peer Review: Author and reviewer identities are disclosed.
IJHED Peer Review Model
IJHED is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. Each submitted manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field
-
ubject-matter expertise
-
Research and publication experience
-
Proven record of providing high-quality academic reviews
The editorial team may also identify reviewers through scholarly databases, reference lists, or academic conferences and seminars.
Editorial Decision Process
Based on reviewers’ reports and editorial evaluation, IJHED may issue one of the following decisions:
-
Accept without Revisions: The manuscript is accepted and published in its original form.
-
Accept with Minor Revisions: The author is requested to make minor corrections before publication.
-
Accept after Major Revisions: Substantial revisions are required; publication follows successful resubmission.
-
Revise and Resubmit: The manuscript is not accepted in its current form but may be reconsidered after major revisions.
-
Reject: The manuscript is declined and will not be reconsidered for publication.
Commitment to Academic Integrity
IJHED is committed to maintaining high ethical standards, fair review practices, and timely editorial decisions, ensuring transparency and academic excellence throughout the peer-review process.
Paper Publishing Process (Double Blind Peer Review)
